Buy low, sell high
Posted on: December 1, 2008
With the official cash rate set to fall even further later this week, shares become relatively appealing when compared with other financial instruments, such as bonds and term deposits.
The old adage of ‘buy low, sell high’ seems fitting, given the battering shares the world over have taken in the past while. The NZX and Dow Jones industrial averages, for example, are both down around a quarter from their respective values six months ago.
But just when is the market ‘low’?
I don’t know! If I did, I’m sure I’d be a lot wealthier than I am. However, I thought it would be useful to write a blog entry to stimulate discussion and debate on what TVHE readers are picking for the sharemarket:
- Is now a good time to buy?
- What industries/companies would you consider investing it?
- What factors are influencing your decisions to invest, or not?
I look forward to hearing our readers’ views on the current state of the sharemarket.
Copyright tvhe.wordpress.com ©
12 Responses to "Buy low, sell high"
December 1, 2008 at 3:13 pm
Would you buy shares or some form of indexed fund?
The fundamentals are so shaken by the last six months, I’ve little faith in the logic of the market, not nearly enough to think PE or EBIT might really indicate future value.
Incidentally, I saw a story in the Sydney press on the weekend, not online as far as I can tell, in which the big audit firms were declaiming any responsibility for the crisis. That’s them, brokers, regulators and legislators… it really must have been that damn future boson/higgs afterall.
December 1, 2008 at 3:27 pm
When I can get a government-guaranteed 10.5% yield on a term deposit why should I bother with shares, which could well have another 20% to fall? My pension is unfortunately 50% invested in an index fund so I am letting that take the hit or reap the benefits of any recovery and keeping everything else out of shares for at least another year. Based on my investment history this is an infallible signal that shares are about to take off, so buy up large!
December 1, 2008 at 6:39 pm
“Would you buy shares or some form of indexed fund?”
I was thinking shares, but the same principles apply.
“The fundamentals are so shaken by the last six months, I’ve little faith in the logic of the market, not nearly enough to think PE or EBIT might really indicate future value.”
But surely not every company is overvalued?
“When I can get a government-guaranteed 10.5% yield on a term deposit why should I bother with shares, which could well have another 20% to fall?”
Tell me more.
“Based on my investment history this is an infallible signal that shares are about to take off, so buy up large!”
Heh.
December 1, 2008 at 9:38 pm
“But surely not every company is overvalued?”
Doesn’t that apply almost all the time?
The key is that it is hard to get a “fair value” calculation on firms during a recession time – as P/E ratios get all wacked out given the volatility in earnings. In many ways the fall in prices leads the decline in earnings – so it looks like there is a lot of good buys out there, and then ex-post everyone realises there wasn’t.
“Tell me more. ”
Finance companies mate – it might be a bit late to give them funds now, many of them are cutting back on how many deposits they are accepting!! It is hard to reconcile that with the existence of a credit crunch aye 🙂
December 1, 2008 at 9:42 pm
“Finance companies mate – it might be a bit late to give them funds now, many of them are cutting back on how many deposits they are accepting!! It is hard to reconcile that with the existence of a credit crunch aye”
I was hoping for some specifics – anyone know any that are still taking deposits?
Doesn’t that apply almost all the time?
“The key is that it is hard to get a “fair value” calculation on firms during a recession time – as P/E ratios get all wacked out given the volatility in earnings. In many ways the fall in prices leads the decline in earnings – so it looks like there is a lot of good buys out there, and then ex-post everyone realises there wasn’t.”
Fair point. However, I was thinking more long term investment. Sure, earnings might be a bit sluggish for a while but companies with assets still own those assets. I thought infrastructure companies might be a good place to start.
December 2, 2008 at 9:02 am
Asset Finance could be the winner, as the highest government guaranteed company, according to interest.co.nz: 9.15% for 12 months.
December 2, 2008 at 2:23 pm
Finance companies, you’re kidding right?
My earlier comment was perhaps more philosophic than I’d conveyed. While I’m not of the view that this crisis spells the end of capitalism as we know it, I do think it’ll ultimately fundamentally reorganise accounting/auditing practices.
The extent of off-balance sheet trading troubles me, it’s inconsistent with the notional symmetry of information. The prevalence of swaps, undisclosed margin-calls and dubious practices like naked short-selling have, IMO, undermined the reliability of a lot of public reporting.
Perhaps I’m being too jaundiced, but with family that were hit by the systematic failure of finance companies, I’ll be giving them a wide berth for a while.
December 2, 2008 at 3:22 pm
“Fair point. However, I was thinking more long term investment. Sure, earnings might be a bit sluggish for a while but companies with assets still own those assets. I thought infrastructure companies might be a good place to start.”
Good point. Although the return on infrastructure will depend on forecasts of growth – which are all over the show 😛
I’m not sure that there are any “sure bets” at the moment 😦 . Generally, if anything has a strong balance sheet and good management they will always be a good pick – so go with them
“I do think it’ll ultimately fundamentally reorganise accounting/auditing practices”
I think we all agree that there will be an impact on the way some industries keep accounts – and the regulation around accounting.
“The extent of off-balance sheet trading troubles me, it’s inconsistent with the notional symmetry of information. The prevalence of swaps, undisclosed margin-calls and dubious practices like naked short-selling have, IMO, undermined the reliability of a lot of public reporting.”
Indeed, the fact that so much information is missing is the reason why credit markets have frozen – hopefully there will be a push to increase the accessibility and availability of information – at least within the constraint of property rights!
“Perhaps I’m being too jaundiced, but with family that were hit by the systematic failure of finance companies, I’ll be giving them a wide berth for a while.”
I agree that finance companies were (and are) dodgy, and that they don’t convey information fully.
However, if the government guarantees deposits – then that really limits an individuals downside.
Is investment based on government guarantees fair – probably not. Is it efficient – no. Will it end up costing society – yes. But it is in the individuals best interest – as they are sharing the risk, but getting to keep any upside!
December 3, 2008 at 1:12 am
Matt, do you know how to code blockquotes? It does make for easy reading.
Good blog discussions, again. Dry as it is, this is the stuff of our daily obsessions (for the moment at least).
[…] An apt quote given current extreme uncertainty, and the talk about stock being “cheap”. […]
agnitio
cpworthington
dant03
goonix
metrosideros
rauparaha
Robbie Allan
stevedoogue
Matt Nolan
The visible hand in economics 
December 1, 2008 at 2:24 pm
I’m liquidity constrained at the moment so haven’t put any serisous thought into this…..
However, given we are enterring (or are already in) a carbon constrained world I’m a fan of investing green!